Simon Fell > Its just code
Sam goes onto say "What's more unfortunate is that the small gaffe obscured Keith's real question, which was how one determines the correct message definition associated with a given message. The answer is that you can't. A message may not have a definition. It may also conform to multiple definitions." I agree with this, but I also think it would be useful to be able to unambiguously refer to a WSDL described operation from outside of WSDL.
Sam saves me the trouble of responsing to Dare's comments, I guess the Infoset meme has taken hold more than i thought, I hardly ever think about namespace prefixs in XML, after all they're just a side effect of a serialization optimization. 99.999% of the time I say QName, I'm thinking of a namespace + localname pair.